Two -block curious curius with the same hash
Mathematical certainty and Scharcity blockchain in the world is exciting to consider what sh. In this article, we will see a hypothetical scenario in which the 2016 block A generates the hash 1 block, B block.
Genesis Block: January 2016
Imagine January 2016 as Abrad New World with all the data and transactions recorded in the blockchain. The first digging block is Genesis Block, it serves as a network base. This original block has a UNI HISE kit for each transaction, or the blocks are added to Bee before.
Collision *
Quick ahead until January 2017, Wen Block B is submitted. Initially, its hash seems a random sequence: „0001010. Howver, unfamiliar block A, Genesis block identical copy is repeated with the same hash. It’s not a coincidence – it’s a collision.
The pulsation effect
Now that the theme of the two blocks is hash, several of these begin to happen:
1
Hash consistency : With identical Heashes network becomes inconsistent. The algorithm of consensus (eg evidence of work) cannot be confirmed by transactions as it should, as both blocks agree on the validity of the transaction.
- block duplication : To resolve this conflict, a mechanism created with a „hard fork” must be performed. This includes blockage of blockchain in two separate branches: one with the original code and the other, repeating the collision (B block).
3
The transaction repetition : When trying to find consensus, the nets are repeated, that is. However, this process is effective due to identical heashes.
- ** The Instaval Networks: As the network continues to collide and duplicate blocks, its stability begins to deteriorate. This leg transaction latency, reduced safety and the likelihood of network accidents.
What would happen next?
With thee chaos, it is unlikely to block the collision and the following hard fork! In this scenario:
Block A *: You may remain „valid”, but it plays a reduced role in the network, more serving as inherited artifact.
* B Block
: Will become redundant and eventually stop existing. Howver, its existence will remember as an abrasion of anomaly, to light a fragment of a blockchain.
Conclusion *
In this way, Hash’s shortcomings are credical in network integrity. The consequence of such clashes is far -reaching, settling the same paste based on transactions.
In conclusion, it is important to make sure that Hense plays the game to ensure the consistency and security of the blockchain networks. The Wen two block theme is hash because we have saved in your scenario, it is instability, duplication and venous collapse robust and cryptographic safe solutions to prevent mistakes in the future.
Note: This article is a fictional research and is not intended for Beakn as a serious forecast for real unit scenarios.